Way to go
In the 1960s I remember finding air travel to be glamorous and exciting. Maybe I had led a sheltered life, but it was certainly better than recent experiences. It may be cheap (though beware the added costs-at Liverpool airport last week, we had to pay 50p for two tiny plastic bags into which we had to put gels and creams) but it is also nasty. For instance, I am all for maximum safety and security and willing to cooperate with as many checks as it takes. But I would like the occasional "please" and "thank you" as I am instructed to remove jackets, cardigans, belts, boots, watches etc. rather than being dealt with as an already convicted criminal. (Do they recruit their security staff from amongst prison warders?)In addition, news from Clickair, the budget "wing" (sorry) of Iberia, which till now has been our favourite low price airline and which takes us fairly conveniently from Sevilla to Gatwick, has me foaming at the mouth. Apparently, they will now allow travellers to take animals-dogs, cats, even chickens, according to the press release-in the cabin, provided they travel in a container. So now we can add a greater variety of germs to those already circulating, not to mention the noise of terrified animals.
We have to travel by air to South America and will be taking a number of internal flights there as well. Anything else is unrealistic. But the nastiness of air travel in europe is why we will be taking the train all the way back from our nearest station to Heathrow for our flight to Santiago.
We have to travel by air to South America and will be taking a number of internal flights there as well. Anything else is unrealistic. But the nastiness of air travel in europe is why we will be taking the train all the way back from our nearest station to Heathrow for our flight to Santiago.